There has been quite a few places where the name util/utils has been used to indicate common utility functions. From a design perspective, the name "util" should be avoided when possible. Instead we should think about whether we can have an explicit module name or add a more informative prefix.
This discussion, however, is about naming consistency of files. Right now there are files named by as util or utils. It might be helpful to pick a consistent naming convention through out the code base. Here are some current potential rationales for the names: - util simply means the utility module(if we choose to view it as a module) - utils do not necessarily serve as a independent module, it means a collection of utilities. Please share your thoughts [poll] - utils - util [/poll] --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/naming-consistency-util-vs-utils/6434/1) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/0f95e70df4560c91b741d1f1265554916372c3532c520ebdb40eff3dba0c0d75).
