Thanks for the proposal. It would be great to list alternatives with labels (see example https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/target-and-attributes/6013), discuss pros and cons, so others can share their opinions easily.
Given that onnx is not rich enough to cover all the operators, such conversion might be limited to a subset. It would be great to document a potential usage cases. Here are some high level thoughts: - It seems does not make sense to use onnx as a serialization format, as we can always store the functions in the native format (with complete coverage) - If we have a target runtime with onnx format in mind, then we should list those runtimes and discuss the scope of the coverage needed. --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-relay-to-onnx/6101/3) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/c8a1fe95921f89c2bf547969b28797053bc07c48608ff4b943bad83135b34931).
