vm::Datatype was intended for runtime ADT objects. However, it can also be interpreted as datatype in the runtime. As a matter of fact, that is something that comes to my mind when i first saw the class.
It would be great if we can rename it to something less ambiguous. e.g. ADTObj? --- [Visit Topic](http://tracking.discuss.tvm.ai/tracking/click?d=WPTE-N3ZUrRdL5bAUbvUWgwf8Bn5uRB7IvNbD_fDw_I4YeK4gU5xI6qXLe58HFO2S_IVK6cZcCnbyBTSIhQgUfe4KOtVHNRzI-wwvjSsQwB0j42rVvooel_555J8yMVFoPvCCwh_jBJ_93qCIqDZWIODfxUJYDar27ocXJwBqE0z0) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](http://tracking.discuss.tvm.ai/tracking/click?d=7cFgOaAA4XIBVlVKt_oyC07uihTjg4Q6cjeBRNRTiPpaYOzFTvdMG53QLV3kE70sLDqrkD-T5Z9BSOF_03P9cfmHqjShDKCq1wdAv3qlcTw-2TqQfzfjAnNIUAQlqBraTYZYaF40_SjNXixVhMdYce74SXUhecnzTOjosGklivZDPGsiA73hZMVrTvB0qTTWjfWYTPZEQ2bHuy7bg9cBtTKVgQ5D9J9RWn_0Egm9Rw_f0). Tianqi Chen, UW, Seattle, WA, 98105, United States http://tracking.discuss.tvm.ai/tracking/unsubscribe?msgid=61J67gVtjNFgW0kfTe4Ecw2
