> Thanks @jackwish > This is a very good analysis. Everything makes sense. I upvote for > restricting to `(u)int8` for now for `Quantize` and `Dequantize`. > > If in future, we see `(u)int16`, we can tackle then. `int32` is highly > unlikely (why not just go to `FP32` as you say).
I am very glad that it helped :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/3591#issuecomment-515272457
