sbp commented on issue #785: URL: https://github.com/apache/tooling-trusted-releases/issues/785#issuecomment-4048714211
After starting to implement this, I'm not sure that we should do it. Our blueprints now use very customised decorators for type safety. If we separate the test routes into another blueprint, we have to largely replicate these decorators but with tiny differences (if a separate blueprint is to be worthwhile) that are hard to parameterise. But, moreover, then we have different decorators for test routes than we do for regular routes. They could start to diverge, and also although our test routes are mostly for performing admin style actions, we want to test the code that we're actually using in practice, i.e. the existing decorators in the existing blueprints. We probably should tidy up the new type safe code at least though. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
