potiuk opened a new issue, #312: URL: https://github.com/apache/tooling-trusted-releases/issues/312
When prepared provider's release, I see that we have 79 licence failuers in our source package: https://release-test.apache.org/report/airflow-providers/2025-11-14/apache_airflow_providers-2025-11-14-source.tar.gz Those files are pretty much exclusively (need to get a thorough check) - generated files that are kept in our sources for convenience so that we do not have generate them using external tools every time we build from sources (minified javascript, mock go generated files and so on). As far as I know such files are not required to have Apache Licence. Currently we maintain our "excludes" of generated code in .rat-excludes. And when running RAT check on our sources, everythign looks good - there are a number of ignored files, life is good. Hoever the Licence Check seems to use other exclusion patterns. It would be pretty inconvenient if we have to use two different sets of exclusion rules, so possibly just implementing the same rules .rat-excludes does would be best? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
