https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799
--- Comment #17 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #16) > Without a relatively simple test case, I think this should be closed for the > time being. There has to be some concurrency involved and the framework > really gets in the way. That is effectively what the NEEDINFO state does. When I do a release I aim to fix all the open bugs that affect that version excluding any in the NEEDINFO state. I'd prefer a simple test case but right now I'd take any test case that reproduced this issue fairly reliably. Without a test case this is going to sit in the NEEDINFO state. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
