https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58031
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- (In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #7) > (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #5) > > I was thinking a using the existing attribute to trigger a 400 response and > > a new attribute to trigger a 413 response. That should cover all the current > > possibilities for parameter/part issues. > > -1. Fair enough. How about using a second attribute to set the response code? If set use the defined code. If not set, use 400. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
