On 29/03/2015 22:49, Andrew Carr wrote: > You want me to do the backport?
Thanks for the offer but I have already done it (doc back-ports are usually easy since the docs are generally consistent between versions). > Do you do it for all versions that the > keyAlias setting applies to? How far back to back-port is a judgement call. As a minimum, any fix needs to be back-ported as far as the version the issue was reported in. We only support back as far as 6.0.x so we never back-port further than that. Beyond that, whether or not to back-port depends on how serious the problem is vs how invasive the patch it. Mark > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:53 PM, <bugzi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57759 >> >> --- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- >> This is the right place and the patch looks good - it was just a couple of >> hours late. >> >> Generally, patches should be against trunk and the committers will >> back-port >> them as necessary but any patch is helpful. >> >> -- >> You are receiving this mail because: >> You are the assignee for the bug. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
