https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57344
Bug ID: 57344
Summary: [PATCH] Provide sha1 checksum files for Tomcat
downloads
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Packaging
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
I prepared a patch that adds *.sha1 files to Tomcat release besides the *.md5
ones.
Are there any objections?
Minor issue fixed by the way:
due to missing <exclude name="*.asc"> the apache-tomcat-8.0.15-embed.tar.gz
archive contains apache-tomcat-8.0.15-embed.zip.asc file that does not belong
there.
Is it worth to add sha2 (sha-512)? I have some questions:
My issues with sha-512:
=========================
1) Is it worth adding sha-512?
Generally users shall use PGP signatures for verification, not the checksums.
2) Not many ASF projects are providing sha2 checksums.
One that I know is Apache Ant,
http://ant.apache.org/bindownload.cgi
Looking at Apache Ant, I have several notes:
a) *.sha512 files are not copied to mirrors, so ASF mirror system knows how to
skip these files. (Good)
b) when I click on the link to a file, browser (Firefox 34) does not display
the file, but prompts to download it. (Unexpected)
Looking at response headers in Firefox, the server sends Content-Type:
application/zip for *.zip.sha512, application/x-gzip for *.tar.gz.sha512,
application/x-bzip2 for *.tar.bz2.
So the server is not configured for these files. It sends text/plain for *.sha1
files.
3) I do not have a command-line tool to automatically verify sha-512.
There exist sha512sum from GNU,
http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/coreutils.html#sha2-utilities
but GnuWin32 CoreUtils do not have this tool.
4) What file format shall we use?
Apache Ant downloads are using hashsum + LF.
We are using hashsum + " *" + filename, which is the format supported by
md5sum and sha1sum GNU utilities.
`openssl dgst -sha512 filename` generates "SHA512(" + filename + ")= " +hashsum
+LF, but I think that openssl does not read this format.
I think it would better to print just the hashsum value, but I wonder if that
is supported by sha512sum tool.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
