2014-12-02 10:04 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: > Possible options: > a) Require servers to support a NO-OP extension. Kind of pointless since > it would just be there to pass the tests. > b) Drop the test. Not ideal. If the API is there it should be tested. > c) Add a "ignore unknown extensions flag" we use just for running the > tests. > d) Require compression support and then use that to test the API. > e) Add support for application provided extensions and then use that to > test the API. > > c) for now followed by e) is probably the best solution with c) being > removed once e) was in place. >
What is the best option for the websockets implementation configuration options ? Rémy
