https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56798
--- Comment #3 from Sebb <s...@apache.org> --- (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #2) > Using a > LIFO structure does in fact mean that the whole pool will stay "hot" > regardless of how big it becomes... as long as the connections are used > frequently enough. Surely you mean FIFO here? > But the frequency of a check-out is not really relevant: only the number of > connections that are used /simultaneously/ is relevant. A site may be able > to get away with a pool with a depth of 2 or 3 connections, but if the pool > grows to 50 connections, they all might stay in the pool and not be evicted > due to the LIFO behavior. Ditto > I'm not sure if the LIFO queue gives a performance benefit -- because the > head of the structure is only under contention for check-outs and the tail > of the structure is only under contention for check-ins Huh? Is that really true of a LIFO queue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
