https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56568
Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #7)
> (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #6)
>
> OK.
> Maybe also allow for DispatcherType.INCLUDE ?
>
> If I remember correctly, Spring (as an example of an MVC framework) allows
> to switch view rendering from one using forward to one using include with a
> single boolean option. If it is an INCLUDE it means that the request has
> already been handled somehow, so it is likely safe for the JSP page to
> handle it.
Hmm. Not sure. Let's wait and see if anyone hits this issue before the EG makes
a decision. The Spring developers and I share an employer so if there were
issues here I'd have expected to have been asked to fix them by now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
