On 19/05/2014 12:01, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> 2014-05-19 13:54 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
>>
>> On 19/05/2014 11:48, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>>> 2014-05-19 13:42 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
>>>>
>>>> On 19/05/2014 09:04, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>> On 18/05/2014 15:19, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>>>>> 2014-05-15 16:14 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The proposed 6.0.40 release is:
>>>>>>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>>>>>>> [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 6.0.40 Stable
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Great job on clearing up all the issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks. Pity I created a regression (BZ 56529) that means I am going
> to
>>>>> have to re-roll the release. I'll wait until Konstantin's additional
> fix
>>>>> has one more vote and that start on a 6.0.41 RC.
>>>>
>>>> The above has been done so I'll start on 6.0.41 shortly.
>>>
>>> Should we include a fix for jdt also? (bug 56543) the current available
>>> version is 4.4RC1
>>
>> Nope. 6.0.x doesn't ship with an updated JDT JAR because it doesn't work
>> with Java 5.
>>
>> If 4.4.RC1 works with Java 5 then we can look to update it when it is
>> formally released. I don't think 6.0.x should depend on an RC.
> 
> ok thanks

For the record, 4.4.RC1 requires Java 6 so it looks like Tomcat 6 is
going to be stuck on 4.3.1 to maintain Java 5 compatibility.

Users are, of course, able to upgrade to a later version of ECJ if they
wish.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to