On 28/04/2014 11:06, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > 2014-04-28 11:12 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: > >>> This test never fails for me. However, the behavior is not identical to >>> NIO (you need more output before getting an IOE, for some reason) so I >>> added more wait. >> >> Oddly, it only fails for me on a VM. I'm still trying to get to the >> bottom of this. >> > There's room for a purely IO issue related to your VM there, since the > test relies on an IO exception being triggered when a client disconnects. > > CI/gump never failed that test I think [after I increased a bit the delay].
I had inspiration. It appears to be a buffering issue of some form. The issue goes away if I increase the size of the message. I'll tidy up the code to use a larger message and update the test. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
