>I am not convinced by the NIO buffering that is used on output. what are you exactly referring to? Maybe I can shed some light on it.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Rémy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I am not convinced by the NIO buffering that is used on output. Due to > concurrent access issues I couldn't use it in NIO 2, but then I cannot see > either what it does to justify using a more complex structure over a > simpler array list. > > If the idea was to reuse buffers (which it doesn't), there is no option > except using a static buffer pool. Was that the original general idea > around this deque structure ? > > Then the upgrade buffering is even more basic, but is probably not a > performance issue, the current code is likely fast enough since it is so > lightweight. > > Rémy >
