https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56415
Martin Hanus <martin.ha...@ysoft.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|unspecified |1.1.29
--- Comment #2 from Martin Hanus <martin.ha...@ysoft.com> ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #1)
> Is use of tcnative important for you? You could switch to the NIO connector
> which won't crash your JVM.
>
> It appears that you are on Windows, yes? What version of tcnative are you
> using? Tomcat 7.0.47 ships with 1.1.29. tcnative 1.1.30 is newly available
> and not vulnerable to Heartbleed as well. Could you test with 1.1.30?
We are running on Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard. We really don't case whether
we use tcnative or NIO Connector. Important thing is that it's working.
Does usage of NIO Connector over tcnative have any noticable performance hit
that we should be aware of? We put quite a load on Infinispan REST server
deployed inside Tomcat.
We are using tcnative which ships in default Tomcat 7.0.47 package. We didn't
changed/upgraded any Tomcat dependency. Therefore, we use Tomcat tcnative
1.1.29.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
