https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56370
Sebb <s...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #2 from Sebb <s...@apache.org> ---
How about adding a comment to the file to explain that these entries are
intended for use with the examples web app?
Also, it would help if there was at least a pointer to the documentation for
the new manager roles.
I agree that default entries should not be provided, but it would help if the
role names were at least documented, for example by including the first part of
the OP's suggestion, i.e.
<!-- manager-gui - allows access to the HTML GUI and the status pages -->
<!-- manager-script - allows access to the text interface and the status
pages -->
<!-- manager-jmx - allows access to the JMX proxy and the status pages -->
<!-- manager-status - allows access to the status pages only -->
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
