Mark,

On 3/19/14, 6:35 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Mar 19 22:35:46 2014
> New Revision: 1579428
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1579428
> Log:
> Proposal
> 
> Modified:
>     tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
> 
> Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=1579428&r1=1579427&r2=1579428&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
> +++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Wed Mar 19 22:35:46 2014
> @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT:
>    +1: markt
>    -1:
>  
> +* Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56275
> +  Fix memory leak if a Filter throws an exception during its destroy() method
> +  http://people.apache.org/~markt/patches/2014-03-19-bug56275-tc6-v1.patch
> +  +1: markt
> +  -1:
> +

I can't seem to find the original patch against Tomcat 7.0 to ask about
this, but I wanted to know who you removed the setFilterDef method -- it
seemed to provide the useful service of decommissioning any Filter that
had already been started. Is that something that never actually happens?

Thanks,
-chris

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to