On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Henri Yandell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Henri Yandell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My main concern is it makes inactive codebases seem alive. ie) extended > > looks as though there's been code change in the last 5 years instead of > > only having had code in it in 2009. Similar with RDC. > > > > > On this topic, I've pinged Rahul offline to get his thoughts on retiring > RDC to the Attic. I'm assuming he's not tracking the dev list. > <snip/>
I'm here, but no dev cycles for RDC at the moment or in the near future. So, attic sounds right. -Rahul > > Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
