On 10/10/2013 20:40, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > On Oct 10, 2013, at 7:48 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > >> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55249 >> >> Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> changed: >> >> What |Removed |Added >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Status|NEW |RESOLVED >> Resolution|--- |WONTFIX > > Is LATER a better status for this? I was planning to look in to > this at some point, it's just work has kept me busy the last few > weeks.
Obtaining the information required via a route other than compilation is likely to be more expensive that the compilation step. I doubt any patch is worth the effort so WONTFIX seems appropriate. It doesn't prevent a fix at a later date. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
