https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55609

            Bug ID: 55609
           Summary: c:forEach loop on integer range consumes unnecessary
                    heap space in proportion to value for "end"
           Product: Taglibs
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P2
         Component: Standard Taglib
          Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org
          Reporter: supp...@aoindustries.com

The implementation of iteration for a forEach tag over an integer range builds
an array of all the Integer objects in the range, and then obtains an iterator
via Arrays.asList(...).iterator().  The unnecessarily consumes a large amount
of heap space when the value of "end" is large.

The method in this comment about performance is basically correct from a *time*
perspective, but completely ignores *space* considerations.

The patch to iterate over an integer range without undue heap space follows.

For JSTL 1.1.1 in
src/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/core/ForEachSupport.java:

// Begin added by AO Industries, Inc.
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
// End added by AO Industries, Inc.



    private ForEachIterator beginEndForEachIterator() {
// Begin removed by AO Industries, Inc.
//        /*
//         * To plug into existing support, we need to keep 'begin', 'end',
//         * and 'step' as they are.  So we'll simply create an Integer[]
//         * from 0 to 'end', inclusive, and let the existing implementation
//         * handle the subsetting and stepping operations.  (Other than
//         * localizing the cost of creating this Integer[] to the start
//         * of the operation instead of spreading it out over the lifetime
//         * of the iteration, this implementation isn't worse than one that
//         * created new Integers() as needed from next().  Such an adapter
//         * to ForEachIterator could easily be written but, like I said,
//         * wouldn't provide much benefit.)
//         */
//        Integer[] ia = new Integer[end + 1];
//        for (int i = 0; i <= end; i++)
//            ia[i] = new Integer(i);
//        return new SimpleForEachIterator(Arrays.asList(ia).iterator());
// End removed by AO Industries, Inc.

// Begin added by AO Industries, Inc.
        // This implementation does not require heap space in proportion to the
number of iterations.
        return new SimpleForEachIterator(
            new Iterator() {
                private final int end = ForEachSupport.this.end;
                private int next = 0;

                public boolean hasNext() {
                    return next <= end;
                }

                public Object next() {
                    if(next > end) throw new NoSuchElementException();
                    return Integer.valueOf(next++);
                }

                public void remove() {
                    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
                }
            }
        );
// End added by AO Industries, Inc.
    }

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to