Hi Christopher, > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 11:35 PM > > It's amazing how a relatively small number of changes can take a page from > 1996 to ... well, at least 2006. :)
Do you mean the design or the markup? :) If you mean the design, I agree - I'm more a programmer than a designer and just wanted to refresh the look of the site a bit - but there is still a lot of room for improvement. ;) However, for improving the HTML markup, I orientated on current HTML5 standards [1], like using the new HTML5 doctype (but due to the old XSLT implementation, it has to be the "legacy-compat" one); using new tags like header, main, footer, time and so on; using data-* attributes for JS (and removing discouraged "document.write()"); not using HTML markup for presentational purposes; etc. So from the markup side, it should reflect the current HTML 5.1 (W3) spec from 2013. :) Regards, Konstantin Preißer [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
