https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55536

Mark Thomas <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
                 OS|                            |All

--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <[email protected]> ---
http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/xkxhfdrp6tslwkao

I've yet to see anyone argue that adding rate limiting to SSL renegotiations
for BIO and NIO is a worthwhile exercise. I'm not against it if there is a use
case and I have a few ideas on how it might be done. But, at the moment, I
simply don't see the point.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to