On 21/07/2013 10:41, Mark Thomas wrote: > I've been comparing Tomcat's behaviour with the RI and it appears that > the parser in the RI always reports lambda expressions with parameters > as functions whereas Tomcat doesn't. I'm taking a close look at the > grammar so see why that might be the case.
There are a number of differences and, short of a detailed analysis of the RI, nothing jumps out at me as a change we could/should make to our current grammar. The effects of some of the potential changes are quite invasive so I'm reluctant to go down the road of aligning the grammars unless we really have to. If we reach a point where we simply can't meet all the spec requirements with the current grammar then we can look again at a closer alignment with the grammar in the spec. I've fixed the latest issue and added a couple of test cases. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
