On 16/07/2013 15:39, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > 2013/7/16 Mark Thomas wrote: >>
<snip/> >> Do you have an example of a valid expression that needs multiple method >> arguments? I'll try and come up with one. If I can't I'll change the >> grammar and re-generate. > > What about > (x->y->x+y)(a)(b) > > in the spec it is said that > > "x->y->x+y is parsed as x->(y->x+y)" I dug into the change history of the grammar used in the spec. The example you quote above is indeed the style of invocation that triggered a change from '?' to '*'. Modifying your example a little, consider this: (x->y->x-y)(1)(2) Is the result +1 or -1? I don't recall anything in the spec that defines which it is. I need to re-read the spec and I hope I've missed something. Failing that, I'll have to dig through the reference implementation to figure out what the intended behaviour is. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
