Apologize for delayed response. 2013/6/26 Jeremy Boynes <jboy...@apache.org>: > On Jun 25, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Help much appreciated - but do we want all the content of all the modules >> to be there? >> >> It feels to me that the website does not map directly to the codebase. We >> want an overall site, and subsites for Standard and for RDC. We don't want >> to have the 14 pom.xmls become a site structure, or the 4 pom.xmls >> (tld-generator and extended). > > Three mini-sites sounds good: a top-level one holding things together and > then sub-sites for standard and RDC. Is there a way to associate the > top-level one with the parent POM and the others with the "root" poms in > standard and rdc? That would match with the things that are likely to be > released (being all "standard" packages together, or all "rdc" packages > together, but not both at the same time). Do we still need an aggregator pom > as well - how about setting up separate CI jobs for "standard" and "rdc"? >
Coud be possible but do you want to deploy sites from tagged modules versions ? (I presume yes). In such case that will changed a bit as all modules will be in a different svn path. > From the "standard" side, how about killing the separate "doc" "examples" and > "standard-test" modules, rolling the documentation and examples into the site > and the test cases into unit or integration tests in the individual modules? > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
