On 06.06.2013 22:54, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 06.06.2013 19:56, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> Rainer, >> >> On 6/6/13 1:32 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >>> On 06.06.2013 18:22, Christopher Schultz wrote: > >>> Proposals mostly for the C files probably make sense in a STATUS file >>> here if they are backports from native trunk. >> >> I was going to make a C-language proposal. >> >> I can't seem to get "configure" to work in trunk because some macros >> aren't working properly (see below), so I've been working in the 1.1.x >> branch. > > See below below :) > >> PS Here's what I get when trying to build tcnative-trunk: > > ... snip ... > > configure.in was broken as was the new java detection macro. Hopefully > fixed in the last two commits. "svn up" and there you go.
I should also warn you: native trunk is not in good shape. Many C files are behind the 1.1 ones. trunk was created for some new features and increased APR minimum version http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-dev/200810.mbox/%3c48e6302b.7060...@kippdata.de%3E but later lots of changes were applied directly to 1.1 and trunk was forgotten. See the January 2013 discussion thread on tcnative. The clean up for the native c files didn't happen. Regards, Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
