On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:37 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote: > Author: markt > Date: Thu Mar 21 16:37:49 2013 > New Revision: 1459389 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1459389 > Log: > Improve performance for typical use cases by roughly an order of magnitude > > Modified: > tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/codec/binary/BaseNCodec.java > > Modified: > tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/codec/binary/BaseNCodec.java > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/codec/binary/BaseNCodec.java?rev=1459389&r1=1459388&r2=1459389&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/codec/binary/BaseNCodec.java > (original) > +++ tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/codec/binary/BaseNCodec.java Thu > Mar 21 16:37:49 2013 > @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ public abstract class BaseNCodec impleme > * Defines the default buffer size - currently {@value} > * - must be large enough for at least one encoded block+separator > */ > - private static final int DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE = 8192; > + private static final int DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE = 128; > > /** Mask used to extract 8 bits, used in decoding bytes */ > protected static final int MASK_8BITS = 0xff;
Wow. THAT change alone had an order of magnitude impact? That's fascinating... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
