On 14.02.2013 20:05, Michael-O wrote: > Am 2013-02-14 00:43, schrieb bugzi...@apache.org: >> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54559 >> >> Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> changed: >> >> What |Removed |Added >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Status|NEW |RESOLVED >> Resolution|--- |FIXED >> >> --- Comment #1 from Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> --- >> Thanks for the patch. >> Applied to 1.1.x in r1445989. >> Will be part of version 1.1.28. > > Why did you guys introduce a minor version bump of an important > dependency in a patch version? > > I would have expected this for tcnative 1.2. This does not adhere to the > Apache versioning scheme.
Probably not intentional. See http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-dev/201302.mbox/%3C511D0900.5000101%40apache.org%3E for a patch. Regards, Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
