An alternative idea would be to checkout another copy of svn, pointed at the version where you started. I do this all the time when I don't want to backtrack in my current working set.
I'm not sure what could be more productive than running the test suite against a stable baseline. Kick if off and go to lunch. That way, you can leave your existing patches intact and deal with that difference. On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Williams, Nick <nicholas.willi...@ul.com>wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:32 AM > To: dev@tomcat.apache.org > Subject: Re: When to notify of changed session IDs? > > >>On 12.02.2013 06:03, Williams, Nick wrote: > >>I tried to run all of the Junit tests locally, but when it completed 30 > minutes later I had dozens of failures and dozens of errors. After > reviewing the messages carefully, I am 99.9% sure that none of these are > due to changes I made. I don't think I have my local environment set up > right to run unit tests. (I would appreciate some guidance on this if > anyone has any.) The majority of the failures were due to > "java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > org.apache.tomcat.util.http.ValuesEnumerator." I am quite comfortable > saying I didn't cause that, but I'm certainly not sure what did. > > > >Tests for Tomcat trunk currently run fine for me, only one error in > TestWebSocket, all other tests pass. > > > >Did you "svn up" your working copy? How do you run the tests? Do you > know, whether you get the same error when running the tests without your > patches? > > > >Regards, > > > >Rainer > > Yes, I "svn up"ed my working copy. I run tests with "ant test." > Unfortunately, I did not run the tests before I started working (stupid I > know), and doing so would require me to revert all of my changes, recompile > and run another 30-minute testing session :-/. Before I spend all that time > (which I'm willing to do if I need to) I'd love if someone would suggest > some things I might be doing wrong. I'd prefer to only have to run those > tests one more time. :-) > > Nick > > This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are > not the intended recipient: (1) you may not disclose, use, distribute, copy > or rely upon this message or attachment(s); and (2) please notify the > sender by reply e-mail, and then delete this message and its attachment(s). > Underwriters Laboratories Inc. and its affiliates disclaim all liability > for any errors, omissions, corruption or virus in this message or any > attachments. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > -- Greg Turnquist (greg.l.turnqu...@gmail.com)
