All, On 10/9/12 6:07 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53986 > > --- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> --- > (In reply to comment #3) >> Possible cause: r1381417 > > Reverting that patch resolves the issue in 7.0.x/trunk, so the regression > appears to be in there. I'm not sure where, though.
Given that r1381417 breaks comment-parsing, should we just revert the whole thing? I have a test case set up that currently fails in 7.0.x/trunk but runs correctly with r1381417 reverted. My plan is to commit the revert of r1381417 plus the test case, then mark the original bug as reopened and ask the original author of the patch if they might look into why comments aren't working properly. The addition of the aforementioned test case should help. -chris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
