Konstantin,

On 8/13/12 9:06 AM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: kkolinko
> @@ -178,12 +161,14 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT:
>    Patch from 7.0.x should apply relatively cleanly, as it is very small:
>    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1041892
>    +1: schultz
> -  -1: kkolinko: r1041892 is not enough. It has bad formatting, a HashMap
> +   0: kkolinko: r1041892 is not enough. It has bad formatting, a HashMap
>    protected field (should be 'Map'), etc. See the current code of Tomcat 7.
>        schultz: current trunk and TC7 code has HashSet<String>. Am I 
> misunderstanding?
>                 I will also add 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1043983
>                             and 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1049264
>                 to fix the formatting issues.
> +      kkolinko: If we missed it, then it has to be fixed in trunk. I think
> +      a patch for 6.0 is needed to properly review the change here.

Can I ask why the use of HashSet<String> rather than Set<String> is a
problem? I intentionally used the implementation class instead of an
interface for a (small) performance improvement. I'm happy to patch
trunk/7.0.x/6.0.x to fix this if you feel that it is important.

Thanks,
-chris

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to