On 07/08/12 22:46, [email protected] wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53601
Mark Thomas <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas <[email protected]> ---
trunk != 7.0.x/trunk hence closing this as INVALID. Maybe we need to start an
8.0.x BZ project for 8.0.x specific issues.
That is correct. I used the bugzilla web interface and discovered that
it would not allow me to post against the latest trunk (aka 8.0), only
against 7.0. I decided the most helpful action was to reopen the
original (misdirected) 7.0 bug report.
There really should be an 8.0 option, otherwise we run the risk of
further (possibly more significant) confusion in future.
I have updated the building instructions for trunk and also included a
reference to OpenJDK and other JDK vendors although on this occasion I did not
use the provided patch.
The new wording is fine with me. I only provided a patch in case the
developers were all busy and would have preferred a "proposed default"
wording.
BTW my patch was against a 8.0 trunk revision number, so that should
have disambiguated it. The specific "bug" and change were obviously
trivial, but the meta-topic is not. I hope this follow up does not cause
offence - I'm just trying to be helpful.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
