Thanks Remy, /Filip
On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:05, Remy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 16:59 -0600, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote: >> I posted some feedback to the expert group: >> >> http://java.net/projects/servlet-spec/lists/users/archive/2012-06/message/15 > > You can find all the discussions about the API in the archive, which > hopefully explain nearly all of the items: > http://java.net/projects/servlet-spec/lists/jsr340-experts/archive > (summary: reuse of existing API, efficiency, user simplicity) > > As for the flags without listeners, it is the regular blocking IO, no > polling occurs (so ready + canWrite are false; in theory ready could be > true if there's something in the servlet buffer). The flag definition is > actually rather precise already (returns false if it may block), but > there's additional wording which will be added later. > > So, sorry about the "bad" result, but that's the least worst the EG > could come up with so far, after considering all API styles (I believe). > > Rémy > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
