> -----Original Message----- > From: jean-frederic clere > Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 17:33 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6 > > On 04/11/2012 01:34 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2012 12:56 > >> To: dev@tomcat.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6 > >> > >> On 04/11/2012 09:36 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: > >>> Ping? Some sponsor for the tc6.0 status file for the below? > >> > >> Won't break an application using their own executor that implements > the > >> StandardExecutor? > > > > You mean because of the changed Executor interface? > > Yep.
Ok. As far as I can see the new method execute(Runnable command, long timeout, TimeUnit unit); of the Executor interface is implemented but not used. Would it still be an acceptable backport if 1. The changes to the Executor interface are removed from the patch 2. The implementation of execute(Runnable command, long timeout, TimeUnit unit); is removed from the patch. If yes I can update the patch. Regards Rüdiger --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
