+1

- Romain


2011/12/20 David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>

>
> On Dec 19, 2011, at 1:06 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
> > On 12/19/2011 07:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> >> Are you reading the thread?  I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has
> >> been maintaining a script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out
> >> of tomcat svn and puts it in an appropriately structured maven
> >> mutli-project build and we've been re-releasing quite a few tomcat
> >> versions using this technique.  Not sure how this is "talk".  I've
> >> experienced enough hostility over the years from the tomcat community
> >> (not necessarily any currently active members) that I'm reluctant to
> >> spend more time on this.
> >
> > So starting with what is in the geronimo repo, how much work would it to
> have a "mavenized" Tomcat?
>
> I did this work and suggested tomcat look at it several years ago, and
>  don't remember all the details, some other people have been maintaining it
> recently.  IIRC the maven projects generate pretty much the same jars as
> the ant build, possibly plus one more to get around the circular
> dependencies among the jars.  So to generate a maven multimodule project to
> build the jars, 20 min to configure the script that builds the project,
> then you have a mavenized tomcat project checked in that builds pretty much
> the same jars as the ant build.  I don't really know what else the ant
> build generates.
>
> >
> >>
> >> As I have said before in previous iterations of this topic, IMO many
> >> of the advantages of maven are not for direct development of the
> >> project itself (although they certainly exist) but in encouraging
> >> interactions with other projects and communities.  You won't be able
> >> to detect these without actually using maven.
> >
> > We already publish artifacs, do you need more of them?
>
> I think the benefit might be more on the order of encouraging people who
> ask "where did this jar come from-- I wanna fix something".  For people
> familiar with maven, there is IMO a much higher barrier to contributing to
>  tomcat than a well-structured maven project. (BTW I must add that I'm
> delighted that the tomcat community seems much more receptive to outside
> input than it did several years ago -- community unfriendliness seems to be
> totally missing now :-) ).
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Jean-Frederic
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to