https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
--- Comment #24 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> 2011-10-13 15:01:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) > With core pool size set to "0" in ContainerBase#initInternal I get no > concurrency at startup. It will be sequential only. If I change it back to > > startStopExecutor = new ThreadPoolExecutor(getStartStopThreadsInternal(), > getStartStopThreadsInternal(), 10, TimeUnit.SECONDS, > startStopQueue); > > I get a concurrent startup. (Startup time for my 20 dummy applications go down > from 16s to 9s) I'll take another look at that. > As ContainerBase#initInternal is also called from StandardContext, each > Context > will get its own startStopExecutor. Is this really needed? It isn't used at the moment and is likely to stay that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
