https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51952
--- Comment #9 from Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com> 2011-10-05 16:39:59 UTC --- If making this behavior transparent to callers is seen as too much overhead/mess/whatever, then I'd vote to revert the sendRedirect() RFC fix. I actually prefer that sendRedirect() does not generate a body as I'm a fan of waste-not-want-not when it comes to IO, CPU, etc, usage. I don't know of any use case I care about that would make use of the response body of a redirect response, so including such a response body seems like a waste. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org