https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51952

--- Comment #9 from Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com> 2011-10-05 16:39:59 UTC ---
If making this behavior transparent to callers is seen as too much
overhead/mess/whatever, then I'd vote to revert the sendRedirect() RFC fix.  I
actually prefer that sendRedirect() does not generate a body as I'm a fan of
waste-not-want-not when it comes to IO, CPU, etc, usage.  I don't know of any
use case I care about that would make use of the response body of a redirect
response, so including such a response body seems like a waste.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to