On 09.08.2011 18:42, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2011/8/9 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: >> On 09/08/2011 10:46, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> We just need to be careful to end up with the latest versions of everything. >> >> I've been thinking about this some more and how we usually work with >> this code. On reflection, I think Rainer is right and trunk should be >> the master copy for this code, with changes ported back to 7.0.x, 6.0.x >> and 5.5.x as they are now. With that in mind, I think an external from >> native (1.1.x and trunk) that points to trunk is the way to go. The >> revision number used for the external can be updated as part of the >> native release process. >> > > Is there a difference between the Java code of native 1.1.x and native > trunk? If there is, one has to keep "1.1.x" sources somewhere. This > can be decided at a later date though.
native trunk does no longer have the java classes. Only the examples and test classes are there, but not the jni package. It was removed in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=802243 as part of the big svn reorg (and test and examples later recreated). Regards, Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
