2011/6/21 Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>: > On 21.06.2011 00:28, ma...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: markt >> Date: Mon Jun 20 22:28:57 2011 >> New Revision: 1137803 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1137803&view=rev >> Log: >> Ordering >> >> Modified: >> tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml > > I always forget whether there's a standard (I would like to have one): > > - Ordering of sections: OK, defined by comment in changelog > - Ordering inside section: > - chronological (oldest first or last)? > - first by add, update, fix (in which order?) > and then chronological (oldest first or last)? > > If the rule is clear, I can add it as another comment into the file. > > Who knows the rules?
Fixes having an issue number are sorted by their number, ascending. That is the only strict rule. There is no ordering by add/update/fix. Other fixed issues are added to the end of the list, chronologically. They eventually become mixed with the numbered issues. (I.e., numbered issues to not "pop up" wrt. others). Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
