On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>wrote:
> Hi Damon, > > > On 15.10.2010 16:13, Damon Green wrote: > >> Hi Tomcat dev, >> >> We have a scenario presently that is causing us some difficulties. >> >> Env is SPARC Solaris10, gcc. >> >> We wish to use the current alpha build of Apache because it includes >> new features in mod_cache that we want to use, they are checked into >> trunk. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/ >> > > Good! > > > We also wish to use mod_jk to connect to Tomcat. >> > > Even better :) > > > Our issue is that we cannot get any version of mod_jk to work with this >> Apache. >> >> We have tried the pre-compiled binaries of mod_jk, and tried to >> compile our own mod_jk. Both scenarios are failing. >> >> When we use the pre-compiled binary mod_jk.so provided by the Tomcat >> connectors. >> >> >> http://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/solaris/jk-1.2.30/sparc/ >> >> mod_jk-1.2.30-httpd-2.2.X.so >> >> bash-3.00# ./apachectl configtest >> httpd: Syntax error on line 139 of /apps/apache-2.3.8/conf/httpd.conf: >> Cannot load /apps/apache-2.3.8/modules/mod_jk.so into server: ld.so.1: >> httpd: fatal: relocation error: file >> /apps/apache-2.3.8/modules/mod_jk.so: symbol ap_log_error: referenced >> symbol not found >> bash-3.00# >> > > That's expected, binaries are not compatible between middle releases. > > > and when we try to compile mod_jk to work with the Apache it fails with >> the >> following errors. This mod_jk compiles fine for Apache 2.2 >> > > ... > > > Is anyone able to shed any light on this issue? Is it likely that we will >> be >> able to get mod_jk to work with the latest Apache code? >> > > Yes, one of the macros copied in from Apache to mod_jk changed its meaning, > that's why the build breaks. It's a known and documented issue and I applied > the following change to mod_jk right now: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1022975 > > Can you try this patch? I expect it applies cleanly to 1.2.30 also, but > didn't actually test it. There is still some constness warning, but I hope > it'll work nevertheless. Any feedback would be helpful. > > Thanks for bringing this up! > > Regards, > > Rainer > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > Thanks Rainer, were going to try that now. Will report back soon. Might be Monday now ;) Regards Damon.
