-0 (or +1) (Well that was clear ... wasn't it?)
The core consideration is the scope of the Tomcat project. If its to
deliver a spec compliant servlet/jsp engine. Then I would say (-0 or -1)
If the scope is to increase to also act as a repository for generic
servlets, then we are in different territory. Yes - the taglib project
is here, but that decision felt more of a side effect of jakarta
disappearing and taglibs needing a new home. jdbc-pool resides here out
of a need to fill a niche dbcp didn't fill. jdbc-pool seems like an
effort which can be spun out into a different project in the future.
From a tech point of view, I'm not sure how this would be bundled in -
since the servlet introduces a few new library dependencies.
-Tim
On 6/3/2010 4:39 AM, Sébastien Migniot wrote:
Hi
I'll try to be quick. I'm a french J2EE Architect and author of Streamy,
at http://www.migniot.com/matrix/projects/streamy
I want to *donate the ProxyServlet.java* to tomcat core/extensions,
available at
https://streamy.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/streamy/trunk/com.migniot.streamy.Proxy/src/com/migniot/streamy/proxy/ProxyServlet.java
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
