On 17/05/2010 17:50, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2010/5/17 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: >> >> That's pretty ugly. Is there really no other way? >> > > You mean, the named loop is ugly? > > Or the old code?
It was the named loop. > I am a bit shivering looking at ([a++] != [b++]), > but I did minimal changes to fix the issue. Understood. If I get a chance, I'll look to see if I can find an equally good alternative. > The code runs frequently, so I think/hope that somebody > has tried to optimize it for performance. It certainly looks like it. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
