https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48253
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> 2010-03-29 14:07:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Patch looks good except that there shouldn't be any > static ... function/type declarations inside .h files. > > Just copy that from ssl_private.h directly to the ssl.c > and only for the forward declarations. Thank you for your time, Mladen. I have updated the patch against the latest source distribution (1.1.20) and moved the proposed content of ssl_private.h to the lines immediately preceding the proposed functions in ssl.c. Please let me know if I misunderstood your directive, or if things are OK. Should I have also moved the CRYPTO_dynlock_value struct to ssl_private.h? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
