On 12/03/2010 12:13, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 12/03/2010 11:32, buddhika chamith wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I am interested in working on the JMX related project idea. > Great. > >> I am in the >> process of going through the documentation and sources relating to JMX in >> Tomcat. Excerpt of the idea mentions that "Tomcat instance to be configured >> entirely via JMX" is the goal of project. Since the JMX infrastructure is >> already present, are there any specific areas that you have already >> identified as lacking support in order to achieve above goal? > > The createStandardService method declared for the MBeanFactory doesn't > exist. That pretty much kills any attempt to do this stone dead before > you start. > > Looks like I did that in error almost a year ago. I'll add that method > and the other methods removed at the time back.
Looks like I spoke too soon. Thsoe changes were in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=778200&view=rev which as to get rid of ServerFactory. Step one of this project will almost certainly be to re-implement those methods without using the now deleted ServerFactory. Mark > With those in place it is a matter of testing to see what works and what > doesn't. The problems are likely to be a combination of the following: > - JMX getters/setters not aligned with changes to underlying objects > - attributes exposed as read/write that should be read-only or need more > work to make write operations safe > - new objects not exposed via JMX > > Mark > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
