https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48716
--- Comment #2 from Henning Blohm <henning.bl...@gmail.com> 2010-02-10 01:57:51 UTC --- Mark, if JULI would test for its implementation of LogManager, it would work as it does now by default and would not create further harm in cases where it does not own the LogManager. If my web apps use JDK Logging as well (and say do not register handlers and your own levels or so), what memory leaks would I need to expect (except that logger names will not be released)? Can elaborate on that please? Thanks, Henning -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
