On 01/01/2010 11:05, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 12/31/2009 01:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Neither the src.zip nor the src.tar.gz matches the tag.
> 
> +++
> Index: build.properties.default
> ===================================================================
> --- build.properties.default  (revision 893580)
> +++ build.properties.default  (working copy)
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
>  version.minor=0
>  version.build=0
>  version.patch=0
> -version=6.0-snapshot
> +version=6.0.22
> 
>  # ----- Default Base Path for Dependent Packages -----
>  # Please note this path must be absolute, not relative,
> +++
> Correct?

I saw that but wasn't too bothered about it. The issue was the corrupted
binaries in both the src distros.

>> A number of
>> binary files of various types (.exe, gif, bmp) look to have been
>> modified. Further investigation shows the fail-safe EOL patch wasn't
>> quite right. I have fixed trunk and proposed the necessary fixes for
>> 6.0.x and 5.5.x
> 
> I voted it :-)

Cheers

> Happy New year
+1

Mark



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to