On 11/02/2009 02:30 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 18:46 +0000, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Nov 2 18:46:21 2009
New Revision: 832039
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=832039&view=rev
Log:
StringBuffer -> StringBuilder for o.a.naming
So I did not test or anything, but is SBuilder faster than SBuffer ? Or
it uses less resources ?
in most uses cases you'd barely see a difference. As speed locking has
gotten much better. (my unqualified guess is that locking is optimistic)
The only time you'd see a difference is if there was an actual
contention on the resource, which with StringBuffers is rare too.
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
