https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744
--- Comment #4 from Greg Vanore <gvan...@solers.com> 2009-10-26 09:33:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I'm not a big fan of trying to work around JVM bugs, but this patch looks like > it is OK (once the missing synchronizing is added). Synchronizing will add a > small hit, but this part of the code is well off the critical path. Yes, I agree with everything you said, except Sun has closed and concluded it is *not* a problem with the VM: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6877740 A bit after posting this I revised my local copy of the patch to add synchronization - should I repost the patch to include it? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
